Legal Opinion

Cagliostro v. Indelli

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 15, 1907PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Motion for the discharge of a judgment.

1Opinion of the CourtGiegerich, J.

Upon this motion for the discharge of a judgment the only question is as to whether the address of the judgment creditor as set forth in the schedules was sufficient. The residence, as stated in such schedules, is simply “Mulberry street, New York City.” In opposition *45it is shown that the creditor in fact resides at No. 141 Mulberry street, and was residing at that place at the time of the filing of -the petition and schedules, and had resided at such place for fifteen years last past, and that his name and address have regularly appeared in the city directories since the time the judgment…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Columbia Bank v. . BirkettNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
  2. Sutherland v. LasherNew York Supreme Court · 1903

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Chevron Oil Co. v. DobieNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  2. Ford Motor Credit Co. v. Diaz (In Re Diaz)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. · 1986
  3. Kreitlein v. FergerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API