Legal Opinion
C.H. Sanders Co. v. BHAP Housing Development Fund Co.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided May 8, 1990No. Nos. 1016, 1017, Dockets 89-6249, 89-6251PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TIMBERS, Circuit Judge:
The defendants in the district court in this action were Samuel R. Pierce, the Secretary of the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (“the Secretary” or “HUD”) and BHAP Housing Development Fund Company, Inc. (“BHAP”), a non-profit corporation organized for the purpose of constructing a facility for the elderly in Brooklyn. The Secretary is the sole appellant/cross-appel-lee. The plaintiffs in the district court were C.H. Sanders Co., Inc. and Bristol Construction Corp. (collectively “Sanders”), a joint venture; they are the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Bell v. HoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Federal Housing Administration, Region No. 4 v. BurrSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Hassett v. WelchSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Gramatan Home Investors Corp. v. LopezNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- Trans-Bay Engineers and Builders, Inc. v. Carla A. Hills, Secretary of Housing and Urban DevelopmentCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1976
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Lightfoot v. Cendant Mortg. Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2017
- Saraco v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Western Securities Company, a Subsidiary of Universal Mortgage Corporation v. Edward J. Derwinski, Secretary of Veterans AffairsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
- Lightfoot v. Cendant Mortgage CorpSupreme Court of the United States · 2017
- Ward v. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.