Legal Opinion

Burtman v. Porchester Holdings, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided October 16, 1996No. 95-4250PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STONE, Judge.

We reverse an order in this interpleader action denying Appellant’s claims for fees and costs based on an offer of judgment. It is undisputed that section 768.79, Florida Statutes, applies only to actions for money damages. The essential issue in this ease involved the competing claims to funds deposited in the court registry between Appel-lee-Porchester Holdings, a judgment creditor of John Faro, and Burtman, the trustee under a family trust to whom Faro had assigned his claims to the interplead funds. The fund constitutes a refund of attorney’s fees owed Faro by the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. VIP Real Estate v. Florida Ex. RealtyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
  2. Press v. JordanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
  3. Coast to Coast Real Estate v. WaterfrontDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Nichols v. State Farm Mut.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
  2. Duncan v. Prudential Ins. Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
  3. Palm Beach Polo Holdings, Inc. v. Equestrian Club Estates Property Owners Ass'nDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009
  4. Raymond Devindra BhairoUnited States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API