Legal Opinion

Harris v. Water & Light Co.

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided December 21, 1901PublishedCited by 21 opinions

FROM MAURY. Appeal in error from the Circuit Court of Manrv County. Sam Holding, J.

1Opinion of the CourtBeard, J.

The plaintiffs in error are partners located and doing business in Columbia, in this State, in the firm name of “Harris & Cole Bros.” The firm consists of two individuals, and a corporation, to wit: “Cole Bros.,” created by the laws of the State of Iowa, whose charter has not been registered in this State, as required by Ch. 31 of the Acts of 1877, and Ch. 122 of the Acts of 1891.

The contract for the alleged breach of which this action at law is brought, was made by this firm, in- this State, with the defendant in error, a corporation with its situs in Columbia, and it was to be performed in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Farley v. LovellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869
  2. Cochran v. Cunningham's Ex'rSupreme Court of Alabama · 1849
  3. Church v. First National BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1877

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Interstate Amusement Co. v. AlbertTennessee Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Louisville Property Co. v. Mayor of NashvilleTennessee Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Evans v. BoggsCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1951
  4. Le Sueur v. Manufacturers' Finance Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1922
  5. Model Heating Co. v. MagaritySupreme Court of Delaware · 1911

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API