Legal Opinion

Crowley, Cook & Co. v. Sumner

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided September 4, 1901PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Assumpsit, for balance of a salary. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Union County; the Hon. Joseph P. Rob arts, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the February term, 1901.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Worthington

This is an action in assumpsit against appellant, a corporation, to recover a balance claimed to be due appellee for salary under a contract of employment.

The return of the sheriff on the back of the summons shows service, “ by delivering a true copy of the same on September 9, 1900, to P. M. Ballard, agent of the within named Crowley, Cook & Co., the president of the said Crowley, Cook & Co. not being found in my county,” etc.

Appellant filed a plea in abatement denying service upon it; denying that P. M. Ballard was its agent; averring that its office and .principal place of business was in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Union Pacific Railroad v. MillerIllinois Supreme Court · 1877
  2. Horn v. Neu & GintzIllinois Supreme Court · 1872
  3. Lanyon v. Michigan Buggy Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1901

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Colorado Debenture Corp. v. Lombard Investment Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1903
  2. R. M. Owen & Co. v. JohnsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1913
  3. Turner v. Pierson Hollowell Walnut Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API