Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Goodman v. Berger

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided December 23, 1987No. Nos. 83-2875, 84-204, 84-1502 consPublished

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partJustice Rizzi

I initially address the majority’s conclusion that the doctrine of substituted judgment is not applicable to this appeal. I respectfully disagree with the majority’s conclusion.

The origin of the doctrine of substituted judgment has been traced back to a 19th century English case, Ex parte Whitbred, in the Matter of Hinde, 2 Merivale 99, 35 Eng. Rep. 878 (1816). In Whitbred, it was recognized that the chancellor could, under proper circumstances, grant to needy relatives part of an incompetent’s surplus income. Such payments were to be determined according to what the incompetent would…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Ainsworth Corp. v. Cenco, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1982
  2. Nonnast v. Northern Trust Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Long v. SoderquistAppellate Court of Illinois · 1984
  4. Christiansen v. ChristiansenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  5. Economy Auto Insurance v. BrownAppellate Court of Illinois · 1948

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API