Legal Opinion

Robert Pugh and Nathaniel Henderson v. James Rainwater

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided October 18, 1977No. 72-1223PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SIMPSON, Circuit Judge:

Since Florida’s admission to the Union persons charged in the courts of that state with bailable offenses were entitled to obtain pretrial freedom by paying or having a surety pay to the court a sum of money refundable upon appearance at trial. Plaintiffs in the instant case, indigent pretrial detainees 1 suing on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated, maintain that this traditional practice denies them equal protection of the law by conditioning their right to pretrial freedom on wealth-based criteria. We agree and hold that equal protection is not…

2Cases cited63 opinions

  1. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Gerstein v. PughSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Griffin v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  5. San Antonio Independent School District v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Harold T. Tarter v. James HuryCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
  2. Leonard Campbell v. Anderson McGruder Superintendent, Detention Services, (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1978
  3. Qutb v. StraussCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
  4. Robert Pugh and Nathaniel Henderson v. James RainwaterCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
  5. Brangan v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2017

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API