Robert Pugh and Nathaniel Henderson v. James Rainwater
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
SIMPSON, Circuit Judge:
Since Florida’s admission to the Union persons charged in the courts of that state with bailable offenses were entitled to obtain pretrial freedom by paying or having a surety pay to the court a sum of money refundable upon appearance at trial. Plaintiffs in the instant case, indigent pretrial detainees 1 suing on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated, maintain that this traditional practice denies them equal protection of the law by conditioning their right to pretrial freedom on wealth-based criteria. We agree and hold that equal protection is not…
2Cases cited63 opinions
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Gerstein v. PughSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Griffin v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- San Antonio Independent School District v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Harold T. Tarter v. James HuryCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- Leonard Campbell v. Anderson McGruder Superintendent, Detention Services, (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1978
- Qutb v. StraussCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
- Robert Pugh and Nathaniel Henderson v. James RainwaterCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
- Brangan v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2017
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.