Feinman v. Philip Fleischer, Inc.
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSoheeibeb, J.
This is a motion to strike out the first, second and third defenses in the answer for alléged insufficiency. The first defense is addressed only to the first cause of action. Although the facts therein alleged may be sufficient *1076to establish that plaintiff was not engaged in interstate commerce, they are sufficient to show, at least prima facie, that plaintiff was engaged in the production of goods for commerce and therefore within the protection of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (U. S. Code, tit. 29, § 201 et seq.). That statute [Act, § 3, subd. (j); U. S. Code, tit. 29, § 203, subd.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Walling v. Jacksonville Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Southland Gasoline Co. v. BayleySupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Stoike v. First National BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1943
- Walling v. Silver Bros.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1943
- Dallum v. Farmers Co-Operative Trucking Ass'nDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1942
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.