Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Anderson

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided September 10, 1947No. A-10797PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJones, J.

This is an original action in habeas corpus by the petitioner, Jim Anderson, in which he seeks to secure his release from confinement in the city jail of Oklahoma City.

By this action the petitioner seeks to test the validity of a city ordinance of Oklahoma City making it unlawful to operate a travel bureau within the limits of Oklahoma City, and providing a penalty for its violation.

The petitioner was arrested and charged by complaint filed before the police court of Oklahoma City, with a violation of said Ordinance No. 5653.

A rule to show cause was issued and a response was filed by the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ex Parte DavisCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1915
  2. In Re ArthurCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1942
  3. In Re WhisenhuntCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1942
  4. Daniel v. District Court of Tulsa CountyCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1945
  5. Ex Parte BennettCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1945

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re Habeas Corpus of ShetskyCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1955
  2. Angel v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1963
  3. Cox v. RainesCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API