Legal Opinion
People's Insurance Co. of China v. M/V Damodar Tanabe
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 10, 1990No. Nos. 88-15529, 88-15530 and 88-15559PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SNEED, Circuit Judge:
A fire aboard the bulk carrier M/V DA-MODAR TANABE sparked this litigation between an insurer of cargo and carriers of the goods. People’s Insurance Company of China (“PICC”), subrogated to appellant China National Light Industrial Products Import and Export Corporation (“China Light”), brought suit in admiralty against Cia. Chilena de Navegación Interoceánica, S.A. (“CCNI”), Atlas Shipping Co. (“Atlas”), Damodar Bulk Carriers, Ltd. (“DBC”), and Celulosa Arauco y Constitu-ción, S.A. (“Celulosa”). Representing the cargo interests, PICC sued the vessel, its owner, and its…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Piper Aircraft Co. v. ReynoSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- United States v. Winston Bryant McConneyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- The PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Damodar Bulk Carriers, Ltd. v. Damodar TanabeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Boruff v. Cook Inlet Energy LLC (In Re Cook Inlet Energy LLC)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Sea-Land Service, Inc. v. Lozen International, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- In re: Daniel Allen Donnan and Gerardee Maria DonnanUnited States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2019