Legal Opinion

State v. Johnson

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 3, 1929No. 21391. Department TwoPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.

Hilda Johnson and Matt Johnson were charged by an information, which contained ten counts, with the crime of grand larceny.

After the information was filed, the defendants made a motion to suppress certain evidence. This motion was sustained, and an order entered, suppressing the evidence. The defendants also moved to quash the information, which was sustained.

Thereafter, and on December 14, 1927, a new information was filed, charging Hilda Johnson alone, which was substantially the same as the prior information. March 7, 1928, the defendant named in the second information moved for the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. MarquetteCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1921
  2. State v. StuderWashington Supreme Court · 1928
  3. State ex rel. Douglas v. StratinerWashington Supreme Court · 1922

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. HarmaWashington Supreme Court · 1929
  2. State v. OjaWashington Supreme Court · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API