Legal Opinion

Sacks v. Commonwealth

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 29, 1983No. Appeal, No. 2588 C.D. 1981PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge MacPhail,

Sol Sacks (Claimant) appeals from a decision of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review (Board) finding him ineligible for benefits as a result of his discharge from Pincus Brothers-Maxwell (Employer) for willful misconduct. Section 402(e) of the *33Unemployment Compensation Law (Law), Act of December 5, 1936, Second Ex. Sesis., P.L. (1937) 2897, as amended, 43 P.S. §802(e). We affirm.1

Claimant w;as last employed as .a cutter of men’s suits by Employer. Employer’s reason for discharging Claimant was a decline in work performance culminating in an incident of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Lake v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  2. O'Keefe v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  3. Wetzel v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  4. Commonwealth v. BaezSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  5. American Process Lettering, Inc. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Guthrie v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  2. Scott v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  3. ET Systems Corp. v. UN. COMP. BD. OF REV.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  4. McCrea v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  5. A. Fletcher v. UCBRCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2022

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API