Legal Opinion

Lehigh Zinc & Iron Co. v. New Jersey Zinc & Iron Co.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided March 15, 1893PublishedCited by 12 opinions

On error.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Dixon, J.

This was an action of trover brought to recover damages for the conversion of twenty-three car loads of ore, mined by the defendant in January, 1889, on a tract of land known as the Mine Hill farm, in the township, of Hardyston and county of Sussex.

The plaintiff claimed title under several deeds, of which only three need be even partially recited. These are:

1. A deed from Samuel Fowler to the Sussex Zinc and Copper Mining and Manufacturing Company, dated March 10th, 1848, conveying in fee “all the zinc, copper, lead, silver and gold ores, and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Halleck v. MixerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
  2. Mooers v. WaitNew York Supreme Court · 1829
  3. Powell v. SmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1833
  4. Gregory v. LewisNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1916

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Budd v. HancockSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1901
  2. Missouri Pac. Rd., Thompson, Trustee v. StrohackerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1941
  3. New Jersey Zinc & Iron Co. v. Lehigh Zinc & Iron Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1896
  4. Arizona Commercial Mining Co. v. Iron Cap Copper Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1920
  5. Biddle v. BiddleNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1979

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API