Legal Opinion
Baumgardner v. Hudson
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided January 3, 1922No. 1428PublishedCited by 3 opinions
Appeal from the Commissioner of Patents. Interference proceedings between Prank J. Baumgardner and Arthur J. Hudson. From a decision of the Commissioner of Patents awarding priority to Hudson, Baumgardner appeals.
1Opinion of the Court
VAN ORSDEL, Associate Justice.
The issue of this interference is expressed in the following counts:
“1. A rubber article, having incorporated therein and inseparably mixed in tlxe rubber finely ground oyster shells for the purpose described.
“2. As an ingredient of a rubber compound, finely ground oyster shells intimately mixed in the rubber compound.
“3. A new plastic composition, composed of rubber, sulphur, and ground mollusk shells.
“4. As a new composition of matter, a rubber product, including a filler oí ground mollusk shells thoroughly incorporated and vulcanized therein.
“5. A new rubber…
2Cited by3 opinions
- Water Hammer Arrester Corp. v. TowerDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1944
- Reusch v. FischerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1931
- Reusch v. FischerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1931