Legal Opinion
Heyman v. Gordon
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided May 6, 1963Published
1Opinion of the Court
40 N.J. 52 (1963)
190 A.2d 670
NATHAN HEYMAN, ADMINISTRATOR AND ADMINISTRATOR AD PROSEQUENDUM OF THE ESTATE OF NETTIE GORDON, DECEASED, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
HARRY GORDON, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT, AND CHARLES SCHNEBER, DEFENDANT.
The Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Argued March 5, 1963.
Decided May 6, 1963.
Mr. Marvin N. Rimm argued the cause for plaintiff-appellant (Messrs. Finn and Rimm, attorneys; Mr. Rimm, of counsel).
Mr. Augustine A. Repetto argued the cause for defendant-respondent (Messrs. Bolte and Repetto, attorneys; Mr. Repetto, of counsel).
The opinion of the court was delivered by HALL, J.
This…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- United New York & New Jersey Sandy Hook Pilots Ass'n v. HaleckiSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Kaczorowski v. KalkosinskiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
- Klein v. KleinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- Long v. LandySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1961
- Koplik v. C. P. Trucking Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.