Edgar C. Ruwe Co. v. Layne & Bowler, Inc.

The question presented is whether the contract upon which the complaint is predicated constitutes a valid and enforcible agreement, or whether it is unenforcible by reason of indefiniteness. If valid and enforcible, the complaint should have been sustained and the warrant of attachment obtained by the plaintiff on the basis of the cause of action pleaded should not have been vacated.

The complaint, in so far as material, establishes that on or about January 23, 1932, the parties entered into an agreement in writing, a copy of which is attached to the complaint; that in February, 1932,…