Legal Opinion

State v. Franklin

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided July 7, 1983No. 446A82PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEYER, Justice.

Defendant contends that his written and recorded confessions were obtained in violation of his fifth amendment right against self-incrimination and his sixth amendment right to counsel. He bases his argument on the following facts:

In March 1981, defendant had been represented by Assistant Public Defender Lyle Yurko on a plea to a charge of indecent exposure. At that time, defendant was also a suspect in the Mecklenburg County murders of Amanda Ray and Nealy Smith, two young children. The Charlotte police department contacted Mr. Yurko subsequent to defendant’s sentencing on the…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Escobedo v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. Kirby v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. North Carolina v. ButlerSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. State v. ArtisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
  2. State v. McCollumSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1993
  3. State v. LeeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994
  4. State v. RouseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994
  5. State v. ParkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API