Legal Opinion

Comen v. Miller

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided May 31, 1930No. Nos. 2117-2119PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, District Judge.

This is a petition and rule thereon to show cause why an alias summons should not be quashed and judgment of non pros entered and the action dismissed on the ground, first, that the present action is barred by the statute of limitations, and, secondly, that there is no legal defendant.

The original puncipe for summons was filed May 7, 1928, and the stateme~at of claim on May 9, 1928. The summons was issued and delivered with the statement of claim to the United States marshal on May 22, 1928. Neither the summons nor the statement of claim was served by the marshal, who…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Johns' EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1916

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Williams v. EdmondsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1975
  2. Maier v. Independent Taxi Owner's Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API