Legal Opinion
Clark v. Flory
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided October 16, 1956No. 7257PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
237 F.2d 597
Mrs. Etta CLARK et al., Appellants,
v.
C. H. FLORY, State Forester, C. West Jacobs, State Park
Director, and Donald B. Cooler, Superintendent,
Edisto Beach State Park, Edisto Island,
South Carolina, Appellees.
No. 7257.
United States Court of Appeals Fourth Circuit.
Argued Oct. 15, 1956.
Decided Oct. 16, 1956.
W. Newton Pough, Orangeburg, S.C., and John H. Wrighten, Charleston, S.C., for appellants.
James S. Verner, Asst. Atty. Gen., of South Carolina (T. C. Callison, Atty. Gen., of South Carolina, on the brief), for appellees.
Before PARKER, Chief Judge, SOPER, Circuit Judge, and FAHY,…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Department Of Conservation And Development v. Lavinia G. TateCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1956
- Clark v. FloryCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1956
3Cited by2 opinions
- Hazel Palmer v. Allen C. Thompson, Mayor, City of JacksonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
- Simkins v. City of GreensboroDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1957