Legal Opinion

AT&T Corp v. J&J Schlaegel Inc.

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided December 18, 2020No. 3:19-cv-00192Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT&T CORPORATION, etc., : Plaintiff, Case No. 3:19-cv-192 : v. JUDGE WALTER H. RICE : J&J SCHLAEGEL, INC., Defendant. DECISION AND ENTRY OVERRULING DEFENDANT J&J SCHLAEGEL, INC.’S MOTION FOR SANCTIONS PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. 16(f) (DOC. #48) AND PLAINTIFF AT&T CORPORATION’S MOTION FOR SANCTIONS PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. 11(DOC. #50) Defendant, J & J Schlaegel, Inc., (“Schlaegel” or “Defendant”), has filed a Motion for Sanctions Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(f), Doc. #48. Defendant asserts that…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Stephen Michael Ridder v. City of Springfield, Clark CountyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
  3. Penn, LLC v. Prosper Business Development Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API