Legal Opinion

Lieske v. Swan

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided October 16, 1933No. 13,387PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bubke

Plaintiffs in error are hereinafter referred to as defendants and defendant in error as plaintiff, as they appeared in the trial court.

This was a suit on a promissory note to which the defenses were the statute of limitations and discharge in bankruptcy. A jury was waived and the cause tried to the court, which found for plaintiff and entered judgment accordingly. To review that judgment defendants prosecute this writ and ask that it be made a supersedeas.

The note was dated January 1, 1923, due July 1; following. The complaint was filed June 20, 1932. It alleged interest paid to July 1, 1926.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Winbourn v. CrumpSupreme Court of Colorado · 1925

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hickerson v. VesselsSupreme Court of Colorado · 2014
  2. Eilke v. RiceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Vessels v. HickersonColorado Court of Appeals · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API