Abshire v. National Union Fire Insurance

ON REHEARING

1STOKER, Judge.

This is a legal malpractice case. The law governing the case is clear, and the case *239presents no legal issues. The facts as found by the trial judge are reasonably based. Therefore, this court is bound by the trial judge’s findings of pure fact under the manifest error-clearly wrong rule. In fact, regarding the pure facts of the case (as distinguished from inferences of fact), there is no substantial difference between the trial judge’s finding of fact and the facts as stated in the majority opinion on original hearing.

THE ISSUE

Under the circumstances, the issue in…