Legal Opinion

Fatjo v. Mayer

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided March 24, 1964No. 1097PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FRUGÉ, Judge.

This suit was brought by certain property owners in Bendel Gardens, a subdivision in Lafayette, to force compliance with a building restriction.

The building restriction provides that “no building shall be used for commercial purposes, and no business shall be operated within the said subdivision, except as otherwise herein stipulated.” The defendant Mayer purchased a home in the subdivision in July of 1960. At that time he established an office in a part of his home for the purpose of representing Scharff & Jones of New Orleans in the sale of bonds. In the *357office Mr. Mayer has a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Salerno v. De LuccaSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1947
  2. Chexnayder v. RogersLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1957

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Deshotels v. FrugeLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1978
  2. Failla v. MeauxLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1970
  3. Fuller v. Hill Properties, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1972
  4. Fatjo v. MayerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1965
  5. Fatjo v. MayerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API