Petroski v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Blackburn, Chief Judge.
Following a jury trial, Fred Ronald Petroski appeals his convictions of kidnapping and theft by taking a motor vehicle. Petroski contends that the evidence was insufficient to support his conviction for kidnapping and that the trial court erred by allowing the introduction of his statement. For the reasons set forth below, Petroski’s convictions are affirmed.
1. In his first enumeration of error, Petroski asserts that the evidence was insufficient to support his conviction of kidnapping because there was no evidence that he intended to kidnap the victim.
On appeal, we…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Raulerson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1997
- Williams v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1986
- Chambley v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1982
- Rhodes v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1991
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Attaway v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003