Legal Opinion

Bishop v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided May 3, 2017No. 4D16-2807PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Brandon Bishop appeals the summary denial of his rule 3.850 motion for post-conviction relief. We conclude that three of Bishop’s claims require an evidentiary hearing because they are legally sufficient and not conclusively refuted by the record provided. We affirm the denial of Bishop’s remaining claims without comment.

Following a jury trial in 2009, Bishop was convicted of attempted first degree murder and sentenced to ninety-nine years in prison. We affirmed the conviction and sentence on direct appeal. Bishop v. State, 100 So.3d 1192 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012). Bishop timely filed a rule 3.850…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Occhicone v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2000
  2. Peede v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1999
  3. Hammond v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010
  4. Lightbourne v. DuggerSupreme Court of Florida · 1989
  5. Bishop v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Fundora-Martinez v. Secretary Department of Corrections (Duval County)District Court, M.D. Florida · 2025
  2. STATE OF FLORIDA v. BRANDON BISHOPDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2020
  3. YUNIOR GALVEZ CASANAS v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API