Legal Opinion
United States v. Schneiderman
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided October 29, 1991No. 90 Cr. 0656 (RWS)PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
Defendants Jerry Schneiderman (“Schneiderman”), Jerry Ranallo (“Ranal-lo”), Larry Butler (“Butler”) and Insertion Advertising Corp. (“Insertion Advertising”) have been charged in a fourteen count indictment with selling and conspiring to sell drug paraphernalia through the services of an interstate conveyance under 21 U.S.C. § 857 and with laundering and conspiring to launder the proceeds of such sales under 18 U.S.C. §§ 1956 and 1957.
The defendants have moved to suppress all evidence seized pursuant to search warrants issued on August 20, 1990, to dismiss the…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. VentrescaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- United States v. Posters 'N' Things Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992
- United States v. Jerry Schneiderman, Jerry Ranallo, Larry Butler and Insertion Advertising Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
- Loper v. New York City Police DepartmentDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1992
- United States v. Hong-Liang LinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
- United States v. Vance Murphy, D/B/A the Store Linda Wallace, D/B/A the StoreCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.