Legal Opinion

Shockey v. Illinois

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided October 14, 1963No. 20 MPublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Per curiam

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Supreme Court of Illinois for further consideration in light of Douglas v. California, 372 U. S. 353.

Mr. Justice Harlan, for the reasons stated in Daegele v. Kansas, ante, p. 1, would have withheld disposition of this petition for certiorari until the disposition, after argument, of that case.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Douglas v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Stevens v. MyersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  2. Henry v. City of Rock HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Horace Edward Williams v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1968
  4. The People v. WashingtonIllinois Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Herbert Eugene Blanchard v. Lou v. Brewer, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1970

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API