Legal Opinion

McGoon v. Shirk

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1870PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Jo Daviess county • the Hon. Benjamin R Sheldon, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Breese

The question presented by this record is, can a promissory note, payable, in terms, in American gold, be discharged by a tender of United States treasury notes, such promissory note having been executed subsequent to the passage of the act of February 25, 1862, called the legal tender act?

This court had occasion, so far back as 1864, to examine this question. The first case was that of Hull v. Kohlsaat, 36 Ill. 130, which was an action at law on a note of this tenor: “ Six months after date, I promise to pay to Alfred Hull, or order, seventy-five dollars, with ten per cent interest, without…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Humphrey v. ClementIllinois Supreme Court · 1867
  2. Whetstone v. ColleyIllinois Supreme Court · 1865
  3. Hull v. KohlsaatIllinois Supreme Court · 1864

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Belford v. WoodwardIllinois Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Crain v. McGoonIllinois Supreme Court · 1877
  3. Foxworthy v. ColbyNebraska Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Dorr v. HunterIllinois Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Bradford Exchange A.G. v. Department of RevenueAppellate Court of Illinois · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API