Legal Opinion

Eubanks v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided April 2, 2009No. CR 08-953PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PAUL E. DANIELSON, Justice.

|,Appellant William Mack Eubanks appeals the judgment of the Franklin County Circuit Court convicting him of the rape of S.T., his then-nine-year-old stepdaughter, and sentencing him as a habitual offender to life imprisonment. Eubanks argues on appeal that the circuit court erred by: (1) admitting testimony regarding alleged pri- or sexual misconduct pursuant to the “pedophile exception”; (2) admitting testimony of the victim pertaining to medical problems she experienced subsequent to the date of the rape in violation of Rule 401 of the Arkansas Rules of Evidence;…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Echols v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
  2. Harmon v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
  3. Cluck v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2006
  4. Willis v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  5. Flanery v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2005

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Chunestudy v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2012
  2. Kelley v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2009
  3. Rounsaville v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2009
  4. Dimas-Martinez v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2011
  5. Croy v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2011

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API