Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Alexander v. Wright

District Court, N.D. Indiana

Decided April 18, 2023No. 3:21-cv-00965Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA SOUTH BEND DIVISION MICHAEL DERRICK ALEXANDER, Plaintiff, v. CAUSE NO. 3:21-CV-965-DRL-MGG WRIGHT et al., Defendants. OPINION AND ORDER Michael Derrick Alexander, a prisoner without a lawyer, filed a second amended complaint. ECF 41. “A document filed pro se is to be liberally construed, and a pro se complaint, however inartfully pleaded, must be held to less stringent standards than formal pleadings drafted by lawyers.” Erickson v. Pardus,

551 U.S. 89, 94

(2007) (quotation marks and citations omitted). Nevertheless, under 28 U.S.C. §…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Imbler v. PachtmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Burks v. RaemischCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
  5. Roy Mitchell, Jr. v. Kevin KallasCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API