Legal Opinion

Fournier v. Johnson

District Court, D. Arizona

Decided December 17, 2009No. CV-08-2309-PHX-ROSPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

ROSLYN O. SILVER, District Judge.

Before the Court is Plaintiffs’ Motion to Amend the Complaint (Doc. 44). Plaintiffs seek to add another plaintiff, Thomas DiCecco, Jr. For the reasons discussed below, the Motion will be granted.

Background

On December 18, 2008, Plaintiff Fournier (“Plaintiff’) filed a Complaint alleging Defendant violated Department of Health and Human Services (“HHS”) policy, the Medicare statute, and the federal constitution by denying Plaintiff medical benefits (Doc. 1 at 10). On April 13, 2009, Plaintiff filed an amended Complaint adding Delores Berg as a Plaintiff…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Go-Video, Inc. v. Akai Electric Company, Ltd., and Matsushita Electric Industrial Company, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
  2. Pure Oil Co. v. SuarezSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. 6 soc.sec.rep.ser. 142, Medicare&medicaid Gu 34,082 Rose Mayburg v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1984
  4. Griggs v. Pace American Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
  5. Caremark Therapeutic Services v. LeavittDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2006

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. (SS) Bailey v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
  2. Bailey v. AzarDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2020
  3. Dorothy Bailey v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API