Legal Opinion
Kaumagraph Co. v. Superior Trade Mark Mfg. Co.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided August 7, 1934No. 442PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CHASE, Circuit Judge.
The patent in suit is No. 1,718,966-, issued to Winthrop Stanley Lawrence July 2, 19-2-9) on his application filed January 11, 192:6. The plaintiff’s right to sue upon it is unquestioned. It is for a marking composition and, more specifically, relates to a transfer ink solid at ordinary temperatures, but fusible to the extent that when heated it can be kept liquid at usable temperatures for about half an hour before it solidifies. A very important characteristic is that it is readily soluble in water.
While the composition is useful as a base for making other things, it is…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- White v. DunbarSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Holland Furniture Co. v. Perkins Glue Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1928
- The Incandescent Lamp PatentSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Homer Brooke Grass Co. v. Hartford-Fairmont Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1919
3Cited by4 opinions
- Sears, Roebuck and Company and the Plymouth Rubber Company, Inc. v. Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1957
- American Chemical Paint Co. v. Firestone Steel Products Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1941
- Guaranty Trust Co. v. Johns-Manville Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1935
- Kirk Optical Lens Co. v. Dimelp Industries, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1981