Legal Opinion

Montpelier Public Library v. Williams County Budget Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 14, 1993No. 92-653PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

We reverse and remand the decision of the BTA.

Although the BTA did consider “Bryan’s unencumbered balance in its expendable fiduciary funds,” we noted in Montpelier, supra, there was no evidence that only the “protected” funds were included in such balance. According to our earlier decision in Montpelier, the BTA was to determine what part, if any, of Bryan’s expendable fiduciary funds consisted of interest.

The BTA on remand found it unnecessary to conduct an additional evidentiary hearing because, it concluded, it could decide from the record what part of the expendable fiduciary funds…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Cleveland Public Library v. Cuyahoga County Budget CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1986

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Montpelier Public Library v. Williams County Budget CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Montpelier Pub. Library v. Williams Cty. Budget Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API