Legal Opinion · Dissent

City of Chattanooga v. Tennessee Alcoholic Beverage Commission

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided June 9, 1975Published

1Dissent

COOPER and HARBISON, Justices

(dissenting).

There are two issue involved in this case; (1) whether municipal corporations have any authority to regulate the sale of intoxicating liquors within their limits and (2) whether or not the ordinance of the City of Chattanooga restricting the sale of alcoholic beverages to a specified zone is arbitrary or unreasonable. The undersigned are firmly of the opinion that municipal corporations do have authority to regulate by ordinance the sale of alcoholic beverages within their limits and that T.C.A. § 57 — 121, as amended in 1949, does not prohibit cities…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Crowley v. ChristensenSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  2. State Ex Rel. Saperstein v. BassTennessee Supreme Court · 1941
  3. State Ex Rel. Major v. CummingsTennessee Supreme Court · 1942
  4. State Ex Rel. Veal v. Mayor of DyersburgTennessee Supreme Court · 1946
  5. City of Lakewood v. Tennessee Alcoholic Beverage CommissionTennessee Supreme Court · 1967

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API