Legal Opinion
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Regency Windsor Management Co.
District Court, W.D. Michigan
Decided August 2, 1994No. 1:93-mj-00361PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
McKEAGUE, District Judge.
This is an action under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”), 29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq. Plaintiff Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”) alleges defendant employers Regency Windsor Management Co. (“Windsor”) and Regency Oakbrook Ltd. (“Oakbrook”) unlawfully discharged Dorothy Wright from employment because of her age. Now before the Court are three motions for summary judgment.
I. OAKBROOK’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
On February 25, 1994, the Court issued an order granting plaintiff leave to amend its complaint so as to add…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Theodore L. Leblanc v. Great American Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Charles Swallows, Teresia Walker, and Vickie Heidel v. Barnes & Noble Book Stores, Inc., State of TennesseeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
- Robert TINKER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SEARS, ROEBUCK & CO., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
- Javetz v. Board of Control, Grand Valley State UniversityDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1995
- Russell v. Bronson Heating and CoolingDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2004
- Berry v. Sage Dining Services, Inc.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2020
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.