Legal Opinion

Moss v. Pennsylvania Department of Corrections

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 18, 2004PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

Senior Judge McCLOSKEY.

Presently before this Court are a pro se application for special relief filed on behalf of Craig Moss (Moss) and. a motion for summary judgment filed on behalf of the Pennsylvania Department of Corrections (DOC). In July of 2002, Moss filed a petition for review with this Court alleging that DOC had violated his constitutional right to access to the courts.1 More spe*617cifically, Moss alleged that the stationery supplies provided to indigent inmates were inadequate to allow Ml access to the courts.2 .

In September of 2002, Moss filed a motion for judgment as a…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Lewis v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. Bounds v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Shaw v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  4. Robert L. Twyman v. Richard A. Crisp, Phillip Kirk, Melvin D. Typer, James E. Sorrells, and Charles E. StamperCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1978
  5. Bronson v. HornCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. D. Young v. J. Wetzel, PA DOCCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2021
  2. J. Page v. Hon. T.P. RogersCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2024
  3. P. Bronson v. J. Wetzel, M. McMullen, B. SmithCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  4. S. Sigman v. DOCCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API