Moss v. Pennsylvania Department of Corrections
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
Senior Judge McCLOSKEY.
Presently before this Court are a pro se application for special relief filed on behalf of Craig Moss (Moss) and. a motion for summary judgment filed on behalf of the Pennsylvania Department of Corrections (DOC). In July of 2002, Moss filed a petition for review with this Court alleging that DOC had violated his constitutional right to access to the courts.1 More spe*617cifically, Moss alleged that the stationery supplies provided to indigent inmates were inadequate to allow Ml access to the courts.2 .
In September of 2002, Moss filed a motion for judgment as a…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Lewis v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Bounds v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Shaw v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Robert L. Twyman v. Richard A. Crisp, Phillip Kirk, Melvin D. Typer, James E. Sorrells, and Charles E. StamperCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1978
- Bronson v. HornCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- D. Young v. J. Wetzel, PA DOCCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2021
- J. Page v. Hon. T.P. RogersCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2024
- P. Bronson v. J. Wetzel, M. McMullen, B. SmithCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
- S. Sigman v. DOCCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2021