Legal Opinion

Monaco v. Peterson

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 29, 1968No. Civ. No. 24406PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtRattigan, J.

—The question presented by this appeal is whether a handwritten letter is admissible to probate as its author’s holographic will. The letter, which is in a barely legible scrawl, reads as follows (strikeouts by the author shown, within brackets) :

“Redwood City Calif July 29—1927
“R 1 Box 317 “Mr. Herman Wolfe
“Dear Brother I will drop you a few lines this morn, this leaves me OK hope you all are the same kid I am flat broke except my place I [a] have not got no job here yet so I am [leaveing] leaveing to hunt work I dont know where I am going but if I ever make enough money to get Stamps I will…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Parsons v. Bristol Development Co.California Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Flores v. ArroyoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Estate of ButtonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  4. In Re Estate of SilvaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Estate of SargavakCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Estate of WolfeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API