Legal Opinion

People v. Thurman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 9, 1992PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Defendant’s contention that the trial court should have charged the lesser included offense of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the seventh degree is without merit. Fourth degree possession requires the possession of one-eighth ounce or more of a narcotic drug (Penal Law §220.09 [1]). Testimony of the police chemist established that defendant, who at the time of his arrest had in his possession 161 vials of cocaine, possessed one-eighth ounce plus 12 grains of cocaine, and, further, that 54 grains equals one-eighth ounce. Defendant argues that because the contents of only 115…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. GloverNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. People v. ArgroNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  3. People v. PerezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. ParkerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  2. People v. ButlerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  3. People v. HoughAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  4. People v. RodriguezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API