Legal Opinion · Dissent

People v. Allen

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided April 16, 1984No. 3-83-0342Published

1DissentJustice Heiple

Pursuant to section 4 of the Sexually Dangerous Persons Act (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1981, ch. 38, par. 105 — 4) (hereinafter Act), the defendant was ordered to undergo psychiatric examinations to determine whether he was sexually dangerous. Two psychiatrists testified that based on their examinations, the defendant was mentally ill and exhibited propensities to commit sex crimes. The majority finds that this testimony was inadmissible because the defendant was not given Miranda warnings before the examinations in violation of his fifth amendment rights. I dissent.

The majority opinion proceeds from…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Estelle v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. The PEOPLE v. GreerIllinois Supreme Court · 1963
  3. People v. PotterAppellate Court of Illinois · 1967
  4. The People v. MunziatoIllinois Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Reilly v. SegertIllinois Supreme Court · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API