Legal Opinion

Weeks v. Dealers' Implement Co.

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided April 28, 1933PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSenter, J.

The parties will be referred to as in the court below, Dealers’ Implement Company, Inc., plaintiff, and W. B. Weeks, defendant. ‘

This suit was commenced in a justice of the peace court by plaintiff to recover of defendant the alleged balance due and owing by defendant to plaintiff under a conditional sales contract for the purchase of a tractor and certain equipment belonging thereto, with interest and attorney’s fees as provided in the face of the contract. The suit resulted in a judgment in favor of the plaintiff in the justice of the peace court for the balance due on the machinery, plus…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hines v. WillcoxTennessee Supreme Court · 1896
  2. McCormick Harvesting Machine Co. v. AllisonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
  3. Somerville v. Gullett Gin Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Jackson v. the Texas Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1929
  5. Boyer v. NeelMissouri Court of Appeals · 1892

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Simonton v. HuffCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2000
  2. Seaton v. DyeCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1953
  3. Pyramid Operating Authority, Inc. v. City of Memphis (In Re Pyramid Operating Authority, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Tennessee · 1992
  4. Simonton v. HuffCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API