State v. Puckett
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Per curiam
Defendant appeals his conviction for possession of a controlled substance. ORS 475.992. He contends that his motion to suppress evidence should have been allowed, that the reimbursement ordered for court-appointed attorney fees was too high and that the date of commencement of his probation was wrong. We agree with the trial court that the search was a lawful incident to a lawful arrest. We write only to modify the order for reimbursement of attorney fees.
As a condition of probation, the court required defendant to pay $609 as reimbursement for the court-appointed attorney expenses. The state…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- State v. WestbyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. HoffmeisterCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
- State v. QuackenbushCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992