State v. Tuttle
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
CLARK, Judge.
Defendant first assigns error to the denial of his motion to suppress the in-court identifications and the photographic identification.
The practice by law enforcement officers of showing suspects singly to persons for the purpose of identification, oft-referred to as “the one-on-one confrontation,” is usually in violation of constitutional due process and has been widely criticized. Stovall v. Denno, 388 U.S. 293, 87 S.Ct. 1967, 18 L.Ed. 2d 1199 (1967); State v. Wright, 274 N.C. 84, 161 S.E. 2d 581 (1968). However, the one-on-one confrontation does not render inadmissible the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Neil v. BiggersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- State v. HendersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. VanceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1980
- State v. PrattWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1978
- S. J. Groves & Sons & Co. v. StateCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
- State v. PulleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006
- State v. HemphillCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012