Legal Opinion

State v. Tuttle

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 15, 1977No. 7622SC1058PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLARK, Judge.

Defendant first assigns error to the denial of his motion to suppress the in-court identifications and the photographic identification.

The practice by law enforcement officers of showing suspects singly to persons for the purpose of identification, oft-referred to as “the one-on-one confrontation,” is usually in violation of constitutional due process and has been widely criticized. Stovall v. Denno, 388 U.S. 293, 87 S.Ct. 1967, 18 L.Ed. 2d 1199 (1967); State v. Wright, 274 N.C. 84, 161 S.E. 2d 581 (1968). However, the one-on-one confrontation does not render inadmissible the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Neil v. BiggersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  5. State v. HendersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. VanceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1980
  2. State v. PrattWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1978
  3. S. J. Groves & Sons & Co. v. StateCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  4. State v. PulleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006
  5. State v. HemphillCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API