Legal Opinion

Taylor v. Hines

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided October 11, 1954No. 39283PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcGehee, C. J.

This is an attachment suit in chancery under the provision of Section 2729, Code of 1942. The appeal was granted from an interlocutory decree whereby the demurrers of the appellants were overruled and the appeal granted to settle all the controlling principles of law involved, “and to avoid expense * *

It is alleged in the bill of complaint that the appellee Eddie Hines was employed to perform certain labor on a building at Natchez, Mississippi, which had been leased by the appellant Busch Jewelry Company No. 2, a Delaware corporation having an office, agents, and employees at Natchez, in…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Cazeneuve v. CurellMississippi Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Boyett v. BoyettMississippi Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Robertson v. F. Goodman Dry Goods Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Engleburg v. TonkelMississippi Supreme Court · 1925
  5. W. Horace Williams Co. v. Federal Credit Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1945

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Tillotson v. AndersMississippi Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Matthews v. ThompsonMississippi Supreme Court · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API