Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Haupt

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 11, 1989No. 175PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MELINSON, Judge:

This is a Commonwealth appeal from the order of the Court of Common Pleas of Centre County granting Christopher A. Haupt’s motion to suppress. The suppression court found that statements Haupt made in response to a state trooper’s questions were obtained during a custodial interrogation without Haupt having the benefit of having his Miranda 1 rights read to him. Thus, the court suppressed his statements. The court also suppressed the information the trooper obtained from the serial number on a revolver found in Haupt’s car as “fruit of the poisonous tree.” The Commonwealth has…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. United States v. PlaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Pennsylvania v. MimmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. MannionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  2. Commonwealth v. KinerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  3. Commonwealth v. BybelSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  4. Commonwealth v. MannionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  5. Com. v. Civitella, M.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API