Legal Opinion

Romero v. United States

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided February 29, 1864PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court 1

68 U.S. 721 (1863)

1 Wall. 721

ROMERO

v.

UNITED STATES.

Supreme Court of United States.

Mr. Carlisle, for the appellants.

Messrs. Bates, A.G., and Black, contra.

2Opinion of the Court · CliffordJustice Clifford

This was a petition for the confirmation of a land claim, under the act of the 3d of March, 1851.

Appellants presented their petition to the commissioners appointed under that act on the twenty-eighth day of February, 1853, claiming title to a certain rancho, situated in Contra Costa County, in that State, and also to certain unoccupied lands adjacent to the same, describing the tract as a sobrante, or overplus beyond what belonged to the…

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. CambustonSupreme Court of the United States · 1858
  2. United States v. NeleighSupreme Court of the United States · 1862

4Cited by18 opinions

  1. Caha v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. United States v. OrtizSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  3. Sprinkle v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1905
  4. Crespin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  5. Wilkins v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1899

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API