Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Byrd

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 10, 1995PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BECK, Judge.

In these consolidated appeals we determine whether, upon sentencing a defendant following revocation of probation, a trial court is limited to sentencing that defendant to a period of incarceration that is less than or equal to the previously imposed period of probation. We find that no such limitation exists. We therefore affirm.

Robert Byrd pled nolo contendere to possession of cocaine with intent to deliver, 1 possession of cocaine, 2 and conspiracy. 3 Byrd was granted a section 17 disposition pursuant to 35 P.S. § 780-117 and was sentenced to probation without verdict for a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. PierceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  2. Commonwealth v. ColeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  3. Commonwealth v. GilmoreSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  4. Commonwealth v. AndersonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  5. Commonwealth v. MillerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. CartretteSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  2. Commonwealth v. WallaceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  3. Commonwealth v. SmithSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  4. Commonwealth v. PhilippSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  5. Saunders v. Commonwealth, Department of CorrectionsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2000

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API