New England Road Machinery Co. v. Quincy Oil Co.
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtQua, J.
On May 14, 1929, the plaintiff was the conditional vendor entitled to possession of certain machinery *243connected with a stone crushing plant located on land of Nelson Brothers, the conditional vendees. Quincy Oil Co. v. New England Road Machinery Co. 274 Mass. 419. The defendant held a mortgage from Nelson Brothers of the real estate where the plant was located, on which it had on March 4 made an entry to foreclose. On said May 14, the defendant foreclosed its mortgage by sale under the power contained therein and itself bought in the property at the sale. The defendant’s mortgage, after…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Lawyers Mortgage Investment Corp. v. Paramount Laundries Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
- Koski v. HaskinsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1920
- Baker v. LothropMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1892
- C. B. Cottrell & Sons Co. v. Carter, Rice, & Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1899
- Quincy Oil Co. v. New England Road Machinery Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
3Cited by11 opinions
- Lehan v. North Main Street Garage, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
- Atlantic Finance Corp. v. GalvamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
- Massachusetts Lubricant Corp. v. SoconyVacuum Oil Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
- Manhattan Clothing Co. v. GoldbergMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1948
- Geguzis v. Brockton Standard Shoe Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.