Legal Opinion

Mercan, Inc. v. City of Baton Rouge

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided May 11, 2001No. 2000 CA 0600PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

1 .DOWNING, Judge.

Mercan, Inc., hereafter “Mercan,” appellant herein, appeals an adverse judgment wherein the trial court dismissed its claim, ruling that the appellee, City of Baton Rouge and Parish of East Baton Rouge, through their Planning and Zoning Commission, hereafter “City/Parish,” did not act arbitrarily and capriciously in denying Mercan’s application for subdivision approval, thus denying Mercan damages. Finding Mercan failed to disclose a cause of action, we affirm the trial court’s judgment dismissing Mercan’s demands.

*723FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Mercan owned a 6.5 acre tract of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Premier Games, Inc. ex rel. Goudeau v. State ex rel. IeyoubLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1999
  2. Liberty Mutual Insurance v. Louisiana Insurance Rating CommissionLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1998

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. American Gaming Ass'n v. Riverboat GamingLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2002
  2. Larkin Development North, L.L.C. v. City of Shreveport consolidated with Larkin Development at Railsback, L.L.C. v. City of ShreveportLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API