Condit v. Neighbor
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Silas Condit and James Yanderpool declared against William Neighbor “ for that, whereas heretofore, to wit: — on the thirteenth day of April, in the year of onr Lord seventeen hundred and forty-seven, at Roxbury, in the county aforesaid, hy a certain deed, then and there made, by and between one John Budd and Sarah his wife, and one Jacob Bodine, the counterpart of which said deed, sealed with the seal of the said Jacob Bodine, the said Silas and James now brincf into court,…
Read the full summary
Silas Condit and James Yanderpool declared against William Neighbor “ for that, whereas heretofore, to wit: — on the thirteenth day of April, in the year of onr Lord seventeen hundred and forty-seven, at Roxbury, in the county aforesaid, hy a certain deed, then and there made, by and between one John Budd and Sarah his wife, and one Jacob Bodine, the counterpart of which said deed, sealed with the seal of the said Jacob Bodine, the said Silas and James now brincf into court, the date whereof is the day and year aforesaid; they the said John Budd and Sarah his wife, and each of them, for…
1Opinion of the CourtEwing, C. J.
The plaintiffs in this action, seek to recover the annual rents for sixteen years reserved in a lease of certain lands in the county of Morris.
The defendant has demurred to the declaration and insists, 1st, that the plaintiffs are not entitled to recover, because from the facts set forth in the declaration, the rents in question belong not to them but to other persons; and 2d, that if any of the rents have accrued to the plaintiffs, they are the rents for a part only and not for the whole of the period demanded.
On the 13th day of April, A. D. 1747, John Budd and Sarah, his wife, being seized…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Stevenson v. The Steamship BovericDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1907