Legal Opinion
Lakeside Feeders, Ltd. v. Chicago Meat Processors, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided January 8, 1999No. 95 C 3655PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
ALESIA, District Judge.
Before the court is claimant Neat, Incorporated’s “motion to return the case from the magistrate judge to this court due to noncompliance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) and Local Rule 1.72(B).” For the reasons that follow, the court denies claimant’s motion.
I. BACKGROUND
Plaintiff Lakeside Feeders, Limited (“Lakeside”) filed suit against defendant Chicago Meat Processors, Incorporated (“CMP”) on a breach-of-contract claim. Both Lakeside and CMP expressly consented pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) to have their case tried by Magistrate Judge Guzman. On…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- William J. Tuke v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
- Lawrence Dunphy v. Margaret McKeeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
- Firoz Jaliwala, Doing Business as Colorgem v. United States of America, and Five Oceans Gem Corporation and Bretislav Stasny, InterveningCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
- Johnson v. GudmundssonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- Mark I, Inc. v. Cyril GruberCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In Re the Search of the Scranton Housing AuthorityDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2007
- Lakeside Feeders, Ltd. v. Chicago Meat Processors, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1999
- PICCINETTI v. CLAYTON, MYRICK, MCCLANAHAN & COULTER, PLLCDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2023